Category Archives: WONS

Pre-Lotus Sūtras Are Like Lands of Poverty

Many other similes are cited in [Medicine King Bodhisattva] chapter, including “a ferryboat to cross over a river.” The meaning of this simile is that the pre-Lotus sūtras are like a raft or a light boat for crossing over the ocean of life and death. It is not easy to cross over an ocean aboard a raft or a small boat from this shore of life and death to the other shore of enlightenment. It is impossible to reach the shore of the Pure Land of Utmost Bliss. For instance, a light boat may be able to start from Chikushi Province (Fukuoka Prefecture) and arrive at Kamakura or Enoshima in the Kanto District, but not to reach T’ang China. A large ship from China can travel from Japan to China without trouble. This chapter also compares having faith in the Lotus Sūtra to a person of poverty finding treasure. The pre-Lotus sūtras are like lands of poverty and those who believe in them are likened to hungry souls. The Lotus Sūtra, on the contrary, is like a mountain of treasures and those who have faith in it are people of wealth.

QUESTION: Do you have scriptural support to claim that pre-Lotus sūtras are like countries of destitution?

ANSWER: The “Assurance of Future Buddhahood” chapter of the Lotus Sūtra preaches, “It is like someone coming from a land of famine suddenly encountering the meal of a great king.”

Yakuō-bon Tokui-shō, The Essence of the “Medicine King Bodhisattva” Chapter, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Faith and Practice, Volume 4, Page 32

‘Self-Nature’ and ‘Other-Power’

The “self-nature” of the Lotus Sūtra is not what non-Buddhists think it to be because we possess in our heart all living beings of the Ten Realms. We have in ourselves the realm of Buddhas, let alone those of all living beings. Therefore, to become a Buddha now does not mean to be a new one. The “other-power” in the Lotus Sūtra, too, is not what non-Buddhists consider it to be. For other Buddhas are contained within each of us by nature. They also manifest themselves in us ordinary people. At this point I am omitting a discussion of both the “dual” and “spontaneous” powers.

Ichidai Shōgyō Tai-I, Outline of All the Holy Teachings of the Buddha, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Page 91

One Sūtra Must Be Supreme to All Other Sūtras.

Though we, as ordinary people, should just believe in and respect any founder of a Buddhist School, I, Nichiren, cannot resolve my doubts at all. In worldly matters, there can be only one sovereign of a country. If there are two, peace cannot be attained. If there are two masters in a home, unity will deteriorate. The same can be said for all the sūtras of Buddhism. One of them, whichever it may be, must be supreme to all other sūtras.

Therefore, if we follow the sūtras uttered by the Buddha without depending on masters and commentators, we shall see the superiority of the Lotus Sūtra, just as the whole world can be seen by anyone who is not blind under the shining sun in the blue sky. Its supremacy is beyond doubt!

Hōon-jō, Essay on Gratitude, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 3-4.

Perceiving the Relative Merits of All Sūtras

I will write this for my followers. Others will not believe in me and go to hell for slandering the True Dharma, which would in turn cause them to obtain Buddhahood. It is possible to know the salinity of the ocean by tasting one drop of water, and the advent of spring by seeing a flower bloom. In the same way, without sailing thousands of miles over to Sung China, without spending as long as three years as Fa-hsien did to visit Mt. Sacred Eagle, without entering the Dragon Palace as Nāgārjuna did, without visiting Bodhisattva Maitreya as Asaṅga did, or without attending the “three meetings at two places for lectures on the Lotus Sūtra (two on Mt. Sacred Eagle and one up in the sky) you will be able to perceive the relative merits of all the sūtras preached by the Buddha during His lifetime by reading this writing of mine.

Kaimoku-shō, Open Your Eyes to the Lotus Teaching, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 89

Once I Decided to Speak Out and Submit My Proposal

Once I decided to speak out and submit my proposal I could not turn back. Instead my proposal grew more insistent by the day, and I was despised by the ruler of the country and attacked by the entire nation. As the whole country of Japan opposed the spread of the Lotus Sūtra, the heavens were offended causing unusual phenomena in the sky to occur including the appearance of a great comet. The earth was enraged and shook continuously. Fighting broke out among the people and foreign troops invaded the country. The Buddha’s prophecy recorded in His sūtras proved to be true just as predicted. From these facts, there is no doubt about my being a practicer of the Lotus Sūtra.

Takahashi Nyūdō-dono Gohenji, A Response to Lay Priest Lord Takahashi, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 7, Followers II, Pages 77

Śākyamuni Buddha’s Three Virtues of Sovereign, Teacher and Parent

[I]n interpreting the parable of the burning house, the Buddha says to Śāriputra: “Now this triple world is my property and the sentient beings in it are my children. There are now many dangers here and I am the only one who can protect them.” Nichiren interpreted this passage as expressing Śākyamuni Buddha’s three virtues of sovereign, teacher, and parent, which are mentioned briefly in a commentary on the Nirvāṇa Sūtra by Zhiyi’s disciple Guanding (561-632). Nichiren asserted repeatedly that only Śākyamuni Buddha of the Lotus Sūtra possesses these virtues with respect to all beings of the present, Sahā world: He protects them, like a powerful ruler; he guides them, like an enlightened teacher; and he extends compassionate affection to them, like a benevolent parent. In contrast, other buddhas, such as Mahāvairocana (J. Dainichi), Bhaiṣajyaguru (Yakushi), or Amitābha (Amida), have no such connection to this world-sphere: “The buddha Amitābha is not our sovereign, not our parent, and not our teacher.” This reading enabled Nichiren to depict the devotion to the buddha Amitābha, so popular in his day, as the unfilial act of honoring a stranger above one’s own parent, or as even a form of treason, such as venerating the ruler of China or Korea over the ruler of Japan.

Two Buddhas, p82-83

The Root of Filial Piety

When Śākyamuni Buddha was a crown prince, King Śuddhodana, the Buddha’s father, did not allow the prince to enter the priesthood. He placed 2,000 soldiers at the four gates of the palace to keep an eye on the prince. Nevertheless, Śākyamuni entered the priesthood against His parents’ wishes. In the secular world one should follow the wishes of one’s parents. In Buddhism, however, it seems to be an act of filial piety not to follow one’s parents’ wishes. Therefore, it is preached in the Meditation on the Mind-base Sūtra regarding the root of filial piety, “It is the true way of repaying indebtedness to enter the Buddha Dharma by severing ties with the long-lasting love of parents.” It means that in true Buddhism entering the priesthood and becoming a Buddha by not following the wishes of parents is the true way of repaying the gratitude of indebtedness.

Even in the secular world it is stated in the Classic of Filial Piety, a Confucian classic, that it would be an act of filial piety for one not to follow one’s parents in the event when one’s parents rise in rebellion. When Grand Master T’ien-t’ai entered the Lotus Meditation, his late parents clung to both his knees, to prevent him from practicing the Buddha way. It was a heavenly devil taking the form of his parents to disturb him.

Kyōdai-shō, A Letter to the Ikegami Brothers, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 6, Followers I, Page 79-80

Collectively Crying Out Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō

QUESTION: Your disciples lack even a basic understanding and yet they collectively cry out Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō. What stage is this equal to?

ANSWER: These people are not surpassed by those at the highest stage of the four flavors and three teachings; also they are stronger than those who practice the perfect teachings prior to the Lotus Sūtra; moreover, they excel beyond the patriarchs of the Shingon and other schools including Śubhākarasiṃha, Chihyen, Tz’ŭ-ên, Chi-tsang, Tao-hsüan, Bodhidharma, Shan-tao and others by a hundred, thousand, ten thousand, hundred thousand-fold! Therefore, I entreat all those who live in this country: please do not show disrespect to my disciples.

If you look into their past you will find that they are great bodhisattvas who have made offerings for 80 trillion kalpa (aeons) to Buddhas as numerous as the sands of the Hiraṇyavati or Ganges Rivers. Or if we speak of the future, they will surpass those who have made offerings for 80 years and will be able to achieve the merits of the 50th person (in succession who hears the Wonderful Dharma, who is spoken of in chapter 18 of the Lotus Sūtra). They are like a baby emperor bound up in swaddling clothes, or a great dragon that has just been born. Do not disdain them! Do not despise them!

Shishin Gohon-shō, The Four Depths of Faith and Five Stages of Practice, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Faith and Practice, Volume 4, Page 107

Supreme Among Past, Present, and Future Sūtras

It is said in the tenth chapter on the “Teacher of the Dharma” of the Lotus Sūtra that among the sūtras that had already been preached, are now being preached, and will be preached, the Lotus Sūtra is supreme. Commenting on this, Grand Master Miao-lê states in his Annotations on the Words and Phrases of the Lotus Sūtra: “Besides the Lotus Sūtra, some sūtras claim to be the king of sūtras, but they are not really the first among sūtras as they do not claim to be one among those which have already been preached, are being preached, and will be preached.” He also asserts in his Commentary on the Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sūtra: “Although the Lotus Sūtra is an incomparable dharma above all the scriptures preached in the past, present, and future, many are confused about this, and they will suffer forever from slandering the True Dharma.”

Surprised by this statement in the Lotus Sūtra and his commentaries on it, I have read all the Buddhist scriptures and commentaries by later teachers. As a result all my doubts have melted away.

Kaimoku-shō, Open Your Eyes to the Lotus Teaching, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 85

Nichiren’s Understanding of the Lotus Sūtra’s Title

This introductory chapter marks a convenient place in the present study to say more about Nichiren’s understanding of the Lotus Sūtra’s title.

First, we might consider the individual words that make up the title. Myō has the connotations of “wonderful,” “marvelous,” and “inconceivable.” The use of this character in the title was Kumārajīva’s innovation; an earlier translation by Dharmaraksa (230?-316) uses shō (Ch. Zheng), meaning “true” or “correct.” Fayun (467-529), an early Chinese commentator on the Lotus Sūtra, took myō (miao) to mean “subtle” as opposed to “crude” or “coarse.” Zhiyi argued that myō has both a relative and an absolute meaning. From a relative standpoint, myō, denoting the perfect teaching, is superior to all others, which by comparison are incomplete. But from an absolute standpoint, myō is perfectly encompassing; there is nothing outside it to which it could be compared. This reading laid the groundwork for later understandings of the Lotus Sūtra as both superior to, and at the same time inclusive of, all other teachings.

Nichiren said that myō has three meanings. The first is to open, meaning that it opens the meaning of all other sūtras. “When the Buddha preached the Lotus Sūtra, he opened the storehouse of the other sūtras preached during the preceding forty-some years, and all beings of the nine realms were for the first time able to discern the treasures that lay within those sūtras,” he wrote. Second, myō means “perfectly encompassing; each of the 69,384 characters of the sūtra contains all others within itself. “It is like one drop of the great ocean that contains water from all the rivers that pour into the ocean, or a single wish-granting jewel that, although no bigger than a mustard seed, can rain down all the treasures that one might gain from all wish-granting jewels.” And third, myō means “to restore to life,” meaning that it revives the seeds, or causes, of buddhahood in those who have neglected or destroyed them.

Renge means “lotus blossom,” and the Sanskrit puṇḍarīka indicates a white lotus. Lotuses grow in muddy water to bloom untainted above its surface and thus represent the flowering of the aspiration for awakening in the mind of the ordinary, deluded person. The lotus plant also produces flowers and seedpods at the same time. To Chinese Tiantai patriarchs, as well as medieval Japanese Tendai interpreters, this suggested the simultaneity of “cause” (the nine realms, or states of those still at the stage of practice) and “effect” (the buddha realm or state of buddhahood), meaning that all ten realms are mutually inclusive. Nichiren draws on the analogy of the lotus to stress his claim that the Lotus Sūtra enables the realization of buddhahood in the very act of practice. As he expressed it: “The merit of all other sūtras is uncertain, because they teach that first one must plant good roots and [only] afterward become a buddha. But in the case of the Lotus Sūtra, when one takes it in one’s hand, that hand at once becomes a buddha, and when one chants it with one’s mouth, that mouth is precisely a buddha. This is just like the moon being reflected on the water the moment it rises above the eastern mountains, or like a sound and its echo occurring simultaneously.”

The last character, kyō, means “sūtra.” Kyō in the title of the Lotus Sūtra, Nichiren said, encompasses all the teachings of all buddhas throughout space and time. Namu, which prefaces the title in chanting, comes from Sanskrit namas, meaning “reverence,” “devotion,” or “the taking of refuge.” Ultimately, Nichiren took it as expressing the willingness to offer one’s life for the dharma. Nichiren made clear, however, that the significance of the daimoku does not lie in its semantic meaning. The daimoku, he said, is neither the text nor its meaning but the intent, or heart, of the entire sūtra. He defined it alternately as the seed of Buddhahood, the father and mother of all buddhas, and the “three thousand realms in a single thought moment in actuality… .”

Two Buddhas, pPage 48-50