Category Archives: Blog

Invitation to Rate One Minute Daimoku Videos

Diamond Path of Daimoku One Minute Daimoku videos

I’m in the process of building a new website that includes 100 reasons why someone should chant Namu-Myoho-Renge-Kyo. The original idea was to help my grandkids understand the value of chanting the Odaimoku, but as I worked in Gemini Notebook to extract reasons why chanting is important I realized that I, myself,  had lost sight of why the Odaimoku is the “Essence of the Essential.” Reading commentaries on the Lotus Sutra, studying other sutras – these are all fine but they shouldn’t become a distraction from the Odaimoku.

As part of this work, I’ve used Gemini Notebook‘s ability to create short explanatory videos illustrating each of the 100 reasons why you should chant Namu-Myoho-Renge-Kyo. Each of these videos is about one minute long and I hope to use them in the future as daily One Minute Daimoku inspiration videos.

Before I finish the overall project I want to get some feedback on the videos. I created a carousel of all 100 videos. When you finish watching a video you are invited to rank the video with one to five stars. The average will be displayed along with the number of viewers who have voted.

My email address appears at the bottom of the page. Feel free to contact me with questions or concerns.

One Minute Daimoku

100 Reasons to Chant the Daimoku

gemini notebook logoI’ve been working with Google’s Gemini Notebook for some weeks to generate a comprehensive explanation of why one should chant Namu-Myoho-Renge-Kyo. The ostensive goal is teach my grandchildren. Since my grandson is less than 4 years old and my granddaughter is just one year old, they’re a little young to be picking this up right now. But, at 74 years of age, my time is running out.

In Gemini Notebook you upload sources and then ask the notebook’s AI agent to answer questions or produce reports. All of the answers and reports are derived from the sources provided. As of this moment I have 89 sources. Here’s a source list.

From these sources Gemini Notebook has identified:

100 Reasons to Chant the Daimoku

The Power of Sacred Language (Reasons 1–20)
  1. Chanting is the language of waking reality that startles and rouses the mind from the sleep of ignorance.
  2. It allows you to achieve the stage of myōji-soku (verbal identity), where you recognize yourself as a buddha through names and letters.
  3. Your vocalization becomes the “Pure Voice” ( brahmasvara ) that echoes the Buddha’s own eternal preaching.
  4. Chanting manifests the Buddha’s intent by utilizing your own physical vocal organs as instruments of the Dharma.
  5. It transforms the “language of dreams”—our discriminative, deluded thoughts—into the absolute truth of the Dharma.
  6. The five characters of the Daimoku contain the spiritual essence and power of all the Buddha’s lifetime teachings.
  7. By holding these words in your heart, you literally “hold the Buddha-body” within your own physical form.
  8. Chanting serves as the specific “seed of buddhahood” required for those living in the age of Mappo .
  9. It is the “audible sound” of the original Buddha’s enlightenment manifesting in the phenomenal world.
  10. It functions as a profound meditative discipline that requires no complex or exclusionary mental visualization.
  11. The characters you chant are “not mere written words” but the living presence of the Thus Come One.
  12. Each character of the Daimoku is like a “living buddha” seated upon a lotus pedestal within your mind.
  13. Chanting represents the “unproduced manifested body” of the original Buddha of original enlightenment.
  14. It is the “path of language” that leads directly to the ultimate truth, rather than wandering through provisional concepts.
  15. Through the Daimoku, the sutra is shown to be interchangeable with the Buddha himself.
  16. Chanting allows you to gain access to enlightenment through the “names and letters” that represent the Buddha’s mind.
  17. It utilizes the “six sense objects” to reveal that all dharmas are, in their essence, the buddhadharma.
  18. Your voice acts as the “spirit” ( tamashii ) that animates the “body” of your daily practice.
  19. Chanting is the “pre-eminent form of practice,” replacing the “medicine” of previous ages that no longer fits our illness.
  20. It reveals the “verbal identity” of all things, showing that even names and letters instantiate the three truths.
Enlightenment in This Very Body (Reasons 21–40)
  1. Chanting provides the “shortened path” to realization, bypassing the need for countless kalpas of practice.
  2. It fulfills the principle of sokushin jōbutsu —attaining buddhahood within your very body, just as you are.
  3. It collapses the linear stages of practice into the single moment of “verbal identity.”
  4. Chanting rouses you from the “dream of birth and death” that characterizes the nine deluded realms.
  5. It aligns you with the “mandalic view” where the cause (practice) and effect (enlightenment) are simultaneous.
  6. It proves that “delusion and enlightenment are a single suchness,” requiring only a change in perspective.
  7. Chanting allows even those “difficult to save” to manifest their inherent buddha-nature instantly.
  8. It reveals the “original ground” of your life, which has been enlightened since the remote past.
  9. Chanting is the “Buddha’s self-practice” shared with the common person to elevate their life-condition.
  10. It enables you to “attain the Way” through the simple act of vocalizing the title of the King of Sutras.
  11. Each word of the Daimoku is endowed with the “eight phases of the Buddha’s life,” from birth to nirvana.
  12. Chanting is the “originally inherent turning of the wheel of the Wonderful Dharma” within your own heart.
  13. It transforms the “temporary union of the five aggregates” into a permanent vessel of the Buddha’s wisdom.
  14. It connects your finite mind to the “mind-ground of waking reality” that is never born and never dies.
  15. Chanting provides the necessary “medicine” for those born in Mappo without prior good roots.
  16. It functions as the “seed” that naturally produces the fruit of enlightenment without artificial effort.
  17. It allows you to recognize the “original mind” that exists before the arising of a single thought.
  18. Chanting reconciles all disparate and provisional paths into the “One Vehicle” of the Lotus.
  19. It manifests the “inconceivable threefold truth” in every single thought-moment of the practitioner.
  20. It allows the practitioner to achieve the “stage of identity in principle” ( ri-soku ) through the hearing of the name.
The Reality of Three Thousand Realms (Reasons 41–60)
  1. Chanting accesses the “original mind of waking reality” that is inherent in all phenomena.
  2. It reveals the “true aspect of all phenomena” ( shohō jissō ) as they exist before your very eyes.
  3. Chanting proves that the “assembly on Sacred Vulture Peak is still present” and has not yet dispersed.
  4. It manifests the doctrine of ichinen sanzen —the interpenetration of three thousand realms in a single thought.
  5. It empowers your environment, recognizing that the “land” is an extension of your own life-conditioned mind.
  6. Chanting reveals that the “ten suchlikes” are present in your own physical form and mental dharmas.
  7. It recognizes the “buddhahood of grasses and trees,” affirming the sacred potential of the insentient world.
  8. Chanting connects you to the “entirety of the enlightened Dharma realm” through a single sound.
  9. It affirms “phenomena just as they are” as being absolute and ultimate reality.
  10. Chanting shows that “heaven and earth have not yet divided” in the realm of ultimate truth.
  11. It recognizes the “mutual interpenetration of concrete particulars” in your daily life.
  12. It allows the “inner enlightenment of the practitioner” to fill and transform their surroundings.
  13. Chanting proves that the “real Buddha has no separate aspect” from the world we inhabit.
  14. It provides the “contemplation of actuality” ( jikan ), seeing original enlightenment in every object.
  15. Chanting reveals that “the finger the word is itself the moon the truth,” refuting the Zen idea of a wordless transmission.
  16. It empowers the “realm of the land” ( kokudo seken ) through the resonance of the True Dharma.
  17. It helps you realize the “nonduality of physical and mental dharmas” ( shiki shin funi ).
  18. It acknowledges that the “spirit of the Buddha” resides within the written characters of the sutra.
  19. Chanting opens the “eye of all buddhas” within your own limited, ordinary vision.
  20. It validates the “sacred nature of all life,” providing a foundation for universal dignity.
Protection and Averting Disaster (Reasons 61–80)
  1. Chanting moves the “benevolent deities” and heavenly kings to protect you and your household.
  2. It provides the spiritual “infrastructure” that protects a land from the three calamities and seven disasters.
  3. Chanting “establishes the True Dharma” ( risshō ) as the only foundation for a truly peaceful country ( ankoku ).
  4. It causes the “four heavenly kings” to guard the place where the sutra is recited.
  5. Chanting serves as a spiritual defense against “pestilence, famine, and war” by rectifying the human heart.
  6. It moves the “gods and sages” who have abandoned a corrupt land to return and provide protection.
  7. Chanting is the specific practice to “eliminate calamities” by aligning the nation with the truth.
  8. It rouses the “benevolent guardians” mentioned in the Medicine Master Sutra to avert strange celestial omens.
  9. It provides the “spiritual power” needed to protect the nation ( Shugo Kokka ) from foreign invasion.
  10. Chanting acts as a “shield” against the “strange occurrences on earth” and “disturbances in the heavens.”
  11. It moves the deities of the Golden Light Sutra to ensure the harmony of the natural world.
  12. It invokes the “spiritual and political order” of a life centered on the Dharma.
  13. Chanting requires you to “face facts squarely,” taking responsibility for the state of your world.
  14. It prevents “the gods from abandoning the country” by upholding the law of the Lotus.
  15. Chanting helps you overcome the “three powerful enemies”—the ignorant, the arrogant, and the false saints.
  16. It addresses the “strange celestial omens” like eclipses and unseasonable storms mentioned in the Medicine Master Sutra .
  17. Chanting counters the “false views of reality” that lead to social and natural decay.
  18. It allows the practitioner to “admonish evil” and uphold the good, creating a culture of integrity.
  19. Chanting creates “peace in the land” by transforming the “masterless house” of the human mind.
  20. It ensures that the “laws of the state” are in harmony with the “laws of the Dharma.”
Transformation of Life and Death (Reasons 81–100)
  1. Chanting possesses the “thaumaturgical power” to ritually animate and empower insentient objects.
  2. It is the essential power used in the “eye-opening ceremony” to consecrate the Gohonzon .
  3. Chanting “infuses a spirit” ( chinkon ) into the sacred icons, making them “living teachers.”
  4. It transforms the “remains of the dead” into the Dharma body through the power of the Daimoku.
  5. Chanting is the “eye of all buddhas” that grants vision and guidance even after death.
  6. It saves the deceased by “transforming the spirit into the Buddha’s mind” during the interim state.
  7. Chanting allows the living to “retrieve the departed spirit” and anchor it in the Buddha’s lifespan.
  8. It serves to “expiate” even the gravest sins and cleanses the heavy karma of the past.
  9. Chanting ensures that even the “remains” ( hone ) are connected to the unborn nature of reality.
  10. It transforms “death” from a point of despair into the realization of the “deathless lifespan.”
  11. Chanting the “five characters” is the act of giving “spirit” to the physical “body” of life.
  12. It creates a “seamless continuum” between your doctrinal understanding and your daily ritual.
  13. Chanting provides the “merit” needed for birth in a pure land or a favorable future existence.
  14. It proves that the “Buddha’s intent” can be embodied in the wood and paper of the Honzon.
  15. Chanting allows you to “revere the living teacher” within the mandala of the Gohonzon.
  16. It acts as the “spirit” ( tamashii ) that gives life to the “body” of the Honzon.
  17. Chanting is the “eye-opening” power that distinguishes a true buddha from a deceptive demon.
  18. It allows one to “attain the stage of acquiescence” ( tokunin ) in their present physical body.
  19. Chanting transforms the “temporary union” of your life into the eternal “Dharma body.”
  20. It ensures that your life—and the lives of those you love—are anchored forever in the “eternal Buddha-body.”

Storybook Update

Devadatta and Dragon Girl

I’ve added the story of Devadatta’s prediction of future Buddhahood to the Dharma Storybook. Unlike earlier stories, this one is aimed at an older, teenage audience.

The images in the Dragon Girl story have also been updated. The original images were not consistent between scenes. The tools have improved since I did that storybook and it is now easier to generate images with consistent characters.

Weighting 500yojanas

intheweights-500yojanas

It’s always interesting to see where one stands in the rankings. The newest ranking is called “the weights.” As the site intheweights.com explains:

WHAT ARE THE WEIGHTS?
Large language models encode their knowledge and reasoning through billions of numbers called “the weights.” The amazing capabilities of AI come through adjusting those weights to better represent world knowledge and tasks.

“In the weights” means that a model is able to recall someone without using tools like web search.

As so, 500yojanas is recognized as “An online handle associated with a creator known for producing content related to Indian mythology, history, and cultural analysis.” Or so says, Gemini 3.1 Lite.

Again, as intheweights.com explains:

WHY IT MATTERS
Being in the weights means your existence was deemed important in the process of creating superhuman artificial intelligence. It’s a kind of fame meaning you live on as long as the model does.

The 151 Strength for 500yojanas puts me in the top 40 percent. Not bad. But if you want real influence look at Daisaku Ikeda’s ranking:

intheweights-ikeda

This is, of course, a product of Soka Gakkai’s willingness to put every document online where the search engines and the AI training can gobble up the data.

It’s also interesting to see that in the world of AI training weights, Daisaku Ikeda is more important than Nichiren, himself.

A Parable of the Burning House for Children

The Parable of the Burning HouseThe Parable of the Burning House

The Parable of the Burning House has been added to the Dharma Storybook collection.

The Meaning of the Blue Fly Metaphor

The_Blue_Fly_Metaphor-20260607

Today’s Gemini Notebook report, The Indestructible Vow: The Diamond Chalice Precept (Kongō-hōki-kai), contains a brief reference to “The Blue Fly and Swift Horse.”

This is a metaphor found in Nichiren’s Rissho Ankoku Ron, his famous Treatise on Spreading Peace Throughout the Country by Establishing the True Dharma. I had read the metaphor several times but didn’t understand it personally until I considered it in the context of the Diamond Chalice Precept.

In Rissho Ankoku Ron, Nichiren uses the metaphor to explain why a lowly priest of no standing can dare to challenge status quo. He is a blue fly riding the powerful Lotus Sutra.

However, in the context of Diamond Chalice Precept, it takes on a different meaning. Today’s article explains that the fly’s success is not due to its own good causes, but to the “effect” of clinging to the horse. The article associates the horse with the Gohonzon, but for me the Lotus Sutra is the horse.

When you realize that the horse is the Lotus Sutra, then you understand why chanting Namu-Myoho-Renge-Kyo is so powerful. An individual’s wealth, education or status are irrelevant. Anyone who clings to the Lotus Sutra can reach the ultimate destination, Enlightenment. That’s the power of Namu-Myoho-Renge-Kyo.

Deep Research Experiment

Gemini Notebook allows you to ask questions of specific sources and receive answers based strictly on those sources. But what do you do if the sources in your notebook don’t have an answer? That’s where Deep Research comes in.

Over the next three days I’m going to publish articles about why Upāli, who was famous for observing and keeping the monastic precepts, is missing from the Lotus Sutra and about the Diamond Chalice Precept, the single precept that replaced the monastic code. These were generated from the “Deep Research” option in Gemini and in Gemini Notebook.

The articles The Hermeneutics of Absence: Upāli and the De-Emphasis of Monastic Legalism in the Lotus Sūtra and Diamond Chalice Precept: Scriptural Genesis, Ontological Evolution, and Hermeneutical Implementation in East Asian Buddhism were generated using Google’s Gemini Deep Research feature and the article The Indestructible Vow: The Diamond Chalice Precept (Kongō-hōki-kai) was generated as a report in Gemini Notebook.

Both Gemini and Gemini Notebook do a great job finding sources to answer a specific question, digesting the information and returning a reasoned report. The big difference between Deep Research in Gemini vs. Gemini Notebook is the inclusion of citations linking the text to its sources. The problem for me was how to get those citations into the articles I publish on 500yojanas.org.

Complicating everything is that multiple citations can be used for a particular text. For example:

Activated through faith and the contemplation of the ultimate Dharma, this single precept is understood to encompass and fulfill all other moral rules within itself.25

When I had Gemini convert the Upali report to HTML, it selected just one citation to keep. I don’t know whether that was random or reasoned. For the Diamond Chalice report, Gemini kept all of the citations and provided links back from the footnotes to the article. Here’s an example of what that looks like:

  1. “The Diamond Chalice Precept in East Asian Buddhism,” Tricycle Magazine. Back to text:
    5.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.10 | 5.11 | 5.12 | 5.13 | 5.14

The fact that one article has a single citation and the other has return links is a good example of the randomness of Gemini’s output if you don’t specifically tell it what you want. To get a consistent output I need to give Gemini an example of what I want and explicit instructions. Here’s what works for me:

Convert this document into an HTML document that can be copied and pasted into a classic editor in WordPress. Use the example-code.txt as a source for how to create the links from the body of the text to the sources and back again.

Format Conversion: Translate all Markdown text, tables, blockquotes, and lists into equivalent, clean, and compliant HTML blocks optimized for pasting directly into the WordPress Classic Editor (HTML Tab).

Superscript Citations: Convert all numeric citations (e.g., [1, 2]) to superscript tags containing distinct anchored links (3).

Bidirectional Hypertext Links: Create a Footnotes & Sources list at the bottom matching each numbered citation. Each multi-use footnote features individual, indexed backward links to return the user exactly to where that citation appears in the document text.

Text Preservation: Keep every word, heading, and table entry strictly identical to your original report without changes or paraphrasing.

Going back to the original problem – your notebook doesn’t have sources for your question – the answer is to upload the new report as a source. Alternatively, you can upload some or all of the new sources identified, but that has to be done manually.

A Children’s Simile of the Herbs

Simile of the Herbs cover image
The latest addition:

The Simile of Herbs
One Teaching for Everyone

Dharma storybooks multilingual

Indigestion

Yesterday, on the same day that Pope Leo XIV released his encyclical, “Magnifica Humanitas”: On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence, Google’s Gemini was asserting that its signature and stamp on a Daily Dharma illustration “verify this authentic interpretation.”

The first thing I did before drafting Cheeky Little Monkey blog post was to open a new browser tab and ask Google: “Today the Pope released a paper on AI. Summarize the main points of his thinking.”

Here’s the response I got:

On May 25, 2026, Pope Leo XIV released his highly anticipated first encyclical, titled “Magnifica Humanitas” (Magnificent Humanity): On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence. The sweeping, 43,000-word document functions as a major moral manifesto. It frames artificial intelligence not as a niche technical tool, but as an anthropological and civilizational turning point on par with the Industrial Revolution.

The main points of the Pope’s thinking focus on several core themes:

  1. Opposing the Concentration of Tech Power
  • Tech Oligopolies: The Pope denounces the “culture of power” and the concentration of massive digital capabilities and computing resources in the hands of a few private Silicon Valley companies.
  • Corporate Control: He warns that a handful of corporate elites shouldn’t dictate global morality through invisible algorithmic infrastructure.
  • Data Colonialism: He strongly critiques “novel forms of colonialism,” calling out the aggressive extraction of health and demographic data as the new “rare earths” of power.
  1. Safeguarding the Dignity of Work
  • Human-Centered Progress: Drawing on traditional Catholic social teachings, the Pope insists that tech innovation shouldn’t come at the cost of the worker.
  • Resisting Automated Efficiency: He warns that humans must not be reduced to “mere cogs in a system” optimized purely for productivity and speed.
  • Protecting Employment: Companies should not use automation as a blanket excuse to eliminate high-paying human jobs solely to maximize profits.
  1. “Disarming” AI and Redefining Warfare
  • No Autonomous Weapons: The Pope explicitly declares that it is “not permissible” to delegate irreversible, lethal military choices to autonomous AI systems.
  • Outdating Just War: He argues that AI remote warfare has accelerated the “normalization of war,” lowering the moral threshold for violence and rendering traditional Catholic “just war” criteria outdated.
  • Disarming Tech Logics: He demands a global “disarmament” of AI—meaning it must be decoupled from the mindsets of harsh military, economic, and cognitive domination.
  1. A Critique of Transhumanism and Posthumanism
  • Embracing Human Limits: The encyclical directly attacks transhumanist movements that view human biological limits and fragilities as flaws to code away.
  • Value in Fragility: The Pope states that human limitation is vital for fostering empathy, relationships, and an openness to God.
  • The “World of Mirrors”: Replacing real, messy human connections with tailored AI companions risks trapping people in isolated algorithmic silos.
  1. Demanding Robust, Public Regulation
  • Beyond Abstract Ethics: The text asserts that voluntary codes of conduct or corporate ethics guidelines are insufficient.
  • Legal Oversight: The Pope calls for independent oversight, strict international legal frameworks, and active political intervention to “slow things down” when technology accelerates too rapidly.

Environmental Impact: He also urges regulators to factor in the heavy environmental toll of AI development, citing its massive consumption of energy and water resources.

Google had gathered information from the Vatican, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, Reuters, PBS, Katie McGrady’s post on Substack, and many other sources, digested it and presented it in an easily consumed package. This was exactly what I love about AI and, in particular, Google’s implementation of this new technology.

It’s also a good example of the peril in the technology. I didn’t have to have a subscription to the New York Times or donate to PBS or support McGrady’s Substack, but I benefited from their work nonetheless.

In 2008, at the start of the Great Recession, I was laid off from my union job as a newspaper editor. The invention of craigslist in 1995 had destroyed the classified ad revenue of the newspaper, display advertising was shrinking as more businesses moved to the growing World Wide Web and the collapse of the housing market was the final straw. The paper I had worked for for more than 28 years was eventually sold to a New Jersey-based hedge fund. Consolidations and more layoffs followed until today what’s left of the newspaper operates out of an office in a strip mall.

Recently the staff of that newspaper refused to put their bylines on stories to protest the use of AI to generate news summaries. I would have supported that protest if I were still working at the newspaper. I was an officer in the union and protecting jobs was my focus. But I also understand why the company is today pushing for AI summaries. Early in by career as an editor one of my jobs was to take stories that arrived from wire services and condense them down so they could be used as filler around the print ads. That was journalism before AI.

It’s with that background that I today use Google’s Gemini AI tools as I study the teachings of Nichiren and the Lotus Sutra.

A good example is my use of Google’s Gemini Notebook to gather together sources that I want to study. My Lotus Sutra Study notebook contains several different translations of the sutra as well as commentaries.

These notebooks allow me to ask questions and then read detailed explanations that are taken directly from the sources in the notebook. It is like reading a scholarly article in a journal.

Here’s a list of some of my NotebookLM notebooks that are publicly available:

Cheeky Little Monkey

When I ask Google’s Gemini to illustrate the Daily Dharma I receive each morning in my email, I tell Gemini to add the signature “Gemini” in Kanji and again with Katakana, reproducing an artist stamp. I do this because in the past Gemini would periodically add a random signature to its work. I figured making Gemini add its signature would avoid the randomness and offer some authenticity to Gemini’s work.

I also ask Gemini to explain the reasoning that goes into each of its illustrations and to identify any people in the illustration. Finally, I ask Gemini to translate any Kanji text in the illustration. Since the signature is often the only Kanji in the illustration, Gemini includes that.

Some days I get a simple:

Kanji Translation:
Artist’s Signature (Kanji): 双子座 (Futago-za, meaning Gemini)
Seal Text (Katakana): ジェミニ (Jemini, meaning Gemini)

On other days, Gemini gets a little creative:

The artist signature 双子座 (Gemini) and the red square hanko seal (ジェミニ) are subtly placed in the bottom right corner.

But today, I got something new:

The signature in the lower right corner, 双子座 (Gemini), and the red hanko seal containing the katakana ジェミニ (Gemini), verify this authentic interpretation.

Now that was cheeky of Gemini. And coming on the same day that the Pope Leo XIV released his encyclical “On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence” it made me pause: Why am I relying so heavily on Google’s AI services?

My son hates AI. He is a self-employed videographer who records, edits, and produces video footage for his clients. He’s always been a creative kid, and I’ve admired his ability to imagine something and turn that into something tangible. He uses all of the modern computer tools to edit and produce his videos but he only sees danger in the AI juggernaut coming for the jobs of regular guys like him.

I’m retired. Unlike my son, I’ve never had to hunt for work. I had a steady, union job on a newspaper that included health insurance and a guaranteed pension. For most of my career I was an editor on the opinion pages. In addition to editing the editorials and Op-Ed articles I was responsible for designing the layout of the opinion pages in the newspaper.

It’s the creative end where I am most enamored with AI. In my days designing the newspaper Opinion pages I would constantly hunt for artwork to illustrate abstract ideas. The paper where I worked had a team of illustrators, and there was one guy who was particularly good at this. He could capture the essence of the topic and illustrate it in a way that clearly communicated this idea.

Google’s Gemini is that artist for me today. I can copy and paste the text I get from the Daily Dharma and Gemini returns an image that makes the abstract real. Today’s Daily Dharma is a good example. The text said:

He should disregard the differences
Between the superior, mean, and inferior vehicles,
Between the things free from causality and those subject to it,
And between the real and the unreal.
He should not say:
“This is a man,” or “This is a woman.”
He should not obtain anything
Or know anything or see anything.
All these are the proper practices
That the Bodhisattva should perform.

The Buddha gives this explanation to Mañjuśrī in Chapter Fourteen of the Lotus Sūtra in which he describes the peaceful practices of a Bodhisattva. When we fully comprehend the idea of dependent origination, that no person has an ego, that each of us is the result of causes and conditions, and that the Buddha Dharma is a cause for good of which we may not be aware, it is no longer necessary to classify the beings with whom we share this world. Our inclinations towards dogma are replaced with curiosity. Our need to dominate is replaced with a need to understand.

This is an incredibly abstract idea but Gemini was able visualize this:

This visual conceptualization for the “Illustrated Daily Dharma” focuses on Mañjuśrī Bodhisattva (Monju Bosatsu), the embodiment of transcendent wisdom, to whom Śākyamuni Buddha addresses Chapter Fourteen of the Lotus Sūtra.

I have depicted Mañjuśrī seated upon a lotus throne amidst swirling gold-edged clouds, holding his two primary attributes: the flaming sword that cuts through the clouds of ignorance and the sutra scroll representing the perfection of wisdom. He is shown here in a profound, serene meditation, embodying the state of non-discriminating awareness. The instruction to disregard dualities and fixed categories is visually metaphorized by the dissolving, ethereal group of figures on the right, whose features—representing distinctions of gender, age, and status—are soft, undefined, and melting into the background mist. An empty, upended begging bowl on the ground signifies ‘non-obtaining.’

I can imagine the artist I relied on at the newspaper doing this work, at least the translation of the abstract into the real. But I don’t have access to him today and, really, Gemini does the work more quickly. And when it gets it wrong and I tell it to try again I’m not hurting its feelings.

This is how Gemini imagines my newspaper work:
Gemini imagines a newsroom in the 1980s
It is not accurate but it’s also not inaccurate and that’s pretty much how I view AI.


Tomorrow: Indigestion