All posts by John Hughes

Day 8

Day 8 concludes Chapter 4, Understanding by Faith, and closes the second volume of the Sutra of the Lotus Flower of the Wonderful Dharma.

Having last month considered in gāthās the rich man’s success in making his son feel at home, Mahā-Kāśyapa explains the meaning of the parable.

You are like the father.
Knowing that we wished
To hear the Lesser Vehicle,
You did not say to us, “You will become Buddhas.”
You said of us to others:
“Though they are my disciples, they are Śrāvakas.
They eliminated āsravas,
But attained only the Lesser Vehicle.”

You said to us:
“Expound the most excellent Way [to Bodhisattvas]!
Those who practice the Way
Will be able to become Buddhas.”

By this order of yours
We expounded the unsurpassed Way
To the great Bodhisattvas
With various stories of previous lives,
With various parables and similes
And with various discourses.•

Hearing the [Way, that is, the] Dharma from us,
Those sons of yours
Thought it over day and night,
And practiced it strenuously.

Thereupon the Buddha assured them
Of their future Buddhahood, saying to them:
“You will become Buddhas
In your future lives.”

You expounded the real thing,
That is, the store
Of the hidden core of the Buddhas
Only to the Bodhisattvas.
You did not expound
This truth to us.

The poor son came to his father,
And took custody
Of the things of his father,
But wished to take none of them.

The same can be said of us.
We did not wish to have the treasure-store
Of the teachings of the Buddhas
Although we expounded it [to the Bodhisattvas].

We were satisfied with the elimination
Of illusions within ourselves.
What we accomplished was that elimination.
We did nothing more.

The Daily Dharma from April 17, 2018, offers this:

We were satisfied with the elimination
Of illusions within ourselves.
What we accomplished was that elimination.
We did nothing more.

These verses are sung by Subhūti, Mahā-Kātyāyana, Mahā-Kāśyapa, and Mahā-Maudgalyāyana in Chapter Four of the Lotus Sūtra. They use the parable of the wayward son in this chapter to describe their own realization that the Buddha had not held any teaching back from them. Instead, the Buddha earlier allowed them to remain in the satisfaction of ending their own suffering. But before they can continue their progress towards the Buddha’s own enlightenment, they must give up their preoccupation with suffering, as the boy in the parable had to give up his idea of himself as a lowly hired worker, rather than the heir to his father’s treasure.

The Daily Dharma is produced by the Lexington Nichiren Buddhist Community. To subscribe to the daily emails, visit zenzaizenzai.com

The Jewel Net

The Mahayana teachings often use the Jewel Net of the god Indra as a metaphor to help people realize the interdependence of all things, including life and its environment. The Jewel Net of Indra is said to cover the entire universe. At each intersection of the net is a jewel, which reflects all other jewels in the net and is in turn reflected by them. Each jewel, then, reflects all the others and is reflected by all the others. In the same way, all things contain one another. Every living being is a reflection of the world from which it arises and the world in turn reflects the living beings. In Nichiren Buddhism, life and its environment are also viewed as mutually supportive and reflective.

Lotus Seeds

Daily Dharma – Feb. 20, 2019

I attained perfect enlightenment and now save all living beings because Devadatta was my teacher.

The Buddha makes this declaration in Chapter Twelve of the Lotus Sūtra. Devadatta was a cousin of the Buddha who became jealous of the Buddha’s enlightenment. Several times he tried to kill the Buddha. He also caused a split in the Buddha’s Sangha, and convinced a young prince to kill his father and usurp the throne. Devadatta was so evil that he fell into Hell alive. Despite all this, the Buddha credits Devadatta with helping him become enlightened, and assures Devadatta personally that he will become enlightened. This shows us that even those beings who create great harm have Buddha nature. They may not deserve our admiration, but they at least deserve our respect.

The Daily Dharma is produced by the Lexington Nichiren Buddhist Community. To subscribe to the daily emails, visit zenzaizenzai.com

Daimoku as Perfectly Inclusive and as the Seed of Buddhahood

While it is impossible in a short space to do full justice to Nichiren’s concept of the daimoku, two aspects of it will be outlined here: the daimoku as perfectly inclusive, and the daimoku as the seed of Buddhahood.

The daimoku, which Nichiren equates with the one vehicle, is all-encompassing, a claim he develops from several interrelated perspectives, beginning with his early writings. For example, in the Hokke daimoku shō, the daimoku is said to contain all teachings:

“The teachings of the seven Buddhas and the thousand Buddhas of the past, and of all the Buddhas since long kalpas ago, as well as the sūtras preached by the Buddhas of the present throughout the ten directions, are all followers of the single character kyō [sūtra] of the Lotus Sūtra. … Within this single character kyō [of myōhō-renge-kyō] are contained all the sūtras in the dharma realms of the ten directions.”

In a yet more encompassing sense, the daimoku contains, or rather is, the entirety of the dharma realm. Another passage of the same text reads:

“The five characters myōhō-renge-kyō … contain all sentient beings of the nine realms and also the Buddha realm. And because they contain [all beings of] the ten realms, they also contain the lands of the ten realms, which are those beings’ dependent recompense.”

Or in greater detail, from an earlier, 1260 writing:

“The doctrines of three thousand realms in one thought-moment and the Buddha’s enlightenment in the distant past, the core of the ‘Skillful Means’ and ‘Fathoming the Lifespan’ chapters, are contained within the two characters myōhō [Wonderful Dharma]. … All Buddhas and bodhisattvas, the causes and effects of the ten [dharma] realms, the grasses and trees, rocks and tiles throughout the ten directions— there is nothing that is not included in these two characters. … Therefore, the merit of chanting the five characters myōhō-renge-kyō is vast.”

Here the daimoku is equated with three thousand realms in one thought moment, the entirety of all that is. This identification can be found in some of Nichiren’s earliest writings. (Page 267-268)

Original Enlightenment and the Transformation of Medieval Japanese Buddhism


Three Types of Object as Ching

[In defining the meaning of sūtra,] Chih-i presents his own definition for the word Ching, in which Ching can bear different meanings for different people. In other words, people with different abilities take different dharmas as Ching. Chih-i’s idea is that Ching as the teaching of the Buddha is contained in all entities or dharmas. Considering that one can attain truth by any entities, any entities or dharmas can be taken as Ching.

Here, Chih-i enumerates three types of dharma that can be taken as Ching. The first type takes sound as Ching. This indicates that when the Buddha is present in the world, he orally expounds the dharma. Listeners, by hearing his voice, can attain the Path. Therefore, the Buddha’s voice is taken as Ching. The second type takes form as Ching. This means that after the Buddha entered into nirvāṇa, written records as form become the means to transmit the Buddha’s teaching. Therefore, form is taken as Ching. The third type takes the dharma as Ching. This refers to the person whose mind is united with the dharma by his own thinking. This is neither achieved by the teaching, nor by the written texts, but by the dharma.

Chih-i stresses that in human world, these three types of object as Ching can suit sentient beings with different faculties.

  1. To the one, whose ear faculty is sharp, capable of attaining realization by sound, sound is the only object that can serve as Ching.
  2. To the one, whose faculty of cognition is sharp, and who is capable of studying and thinking by oneself, dharma is the only object that can serve as Ching.
  3. To the one, whose eye faculty is sharp, and who is capable of realizing truth through written records, form is the only object that can serve as Ching.

Day 7

Day 7 concludes Chapter 3, A Parable, and begins Chapter 4, Understanding by Faith.

Having last month considered why the Buddha expounds only to people of profound wisdom this Sūtra of the Lotus Flower of the Wonderful Dharma, we consider the fate of those who scowl at this sūtra.

Some will scowl at this sūtra
And doubt it.
Listen! I will tell you
How they will be punished.

In my lifetime or after my extinction
Some will slander this sūtra,
And despise the person
Who reads or recites
Or copies or keeps this sūtra.
They will hate him,
Look at him with jealousy,
And harbor enmity against him.
Listen! I will tell you
How they will be punished.

When their present lives end,
They will fall into the Avici Hell.
They will live there for a kalpa,
And have their rebirth in the same hell.
This rebirth of theirs will be repeated
For innumerable kalpas.

Nichiren discusses the depths of hell in his Letter to Hōren:

QUESTION: What kind of hell do slanderers of the practicer of the Lotus Sūtra fall into?

ANSWER: The Lotus Sūtra, fascicle 2 (“A Parable” chapter), preaches, “Those who despise, hate, envy, and bear a grudge against a person who reads, recites, copies and upholds the Lotus Sūtra will fall into Avici Hell upon death. After suffering in this hell for as long as a kalpa, they will again die at the end of the kalpa and fall into the same hell to suffer. They will repeat this countless times and continue to suffer for innumerable kalpa (aeons).”

The palace of King Yama is located 500 yojana below the surface of the earth. Below the palace, between the depths of 500 and 1,500 yojana underground are located 136 hells such as the Eight Great Hells. 128 of the 136 hells are the abodes of minor criminals while the Eight Great Hells are the abodes of felons. Seven of the Eight Great Hells are for the offenders of the Ten Evil Acts while the last of the Eight Great Hells, the Hell of Incessant Suffering, is the abode of those who committed the Five Rebellious Sins, undutiful children, and slanderers of the Lotus Sūtra. To sum up, this passage cited from the “Parable” chapter of the Lotus Sūtra preaches that those who speak ill of or slander the practicer of the Lotus Sūtra in the Latter Age of Degeneration in this world even in jest must fall into the Hell of Incessant Suffering.

Hōren-shō, Letter to Hōren, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 6, Followers I, Page 45

Daily Dharma – Feb. 19, 2019

The Buddhas, the Tathāgatas, teach only Bodhisattvas. All they do is for one purpose, that is, to show the insight of the Buddha to all living beings, to cause them to obtain the insight of the Buddha.

The Buddha speaks these words in Chapter Two of the Lotus Sutra. Here he emphasizes the importance of practice for reaching enlightenment. We may think that just hearing what the Buddha teaches is enough to reach his insight of seeing things for what they are. We also need to be actively engaged with the world, doing our best, making mistakes, and confident that we can continue to learn how to make things better. This is no different from the mistaken belief that one can learn how to cook by merely reading recipes. Only by going in the kitchen and making something can one gain the insight of whoever came up with the recipe.

The Daily Dharma is produced by the Lexington Nichiren Buddhist Community. To subscribe to the daily emails, visit zenzaizenzai.com

The Daimoku in Five or Seven Characters

From his earliest writings, Nichiren discusses “the daimoku in five or seven characters” as something far more potent than the mere title of a text. The Hokke daimoku shō (On the title of the Lotus), written in 1266, one of his earliest extended discussions of the subject, defines it as “the heart of the eighty-thousand holy teachings and the eye of all the Buddhas.” This theme continues throughout his later writings as well. “People today think that myōhō-renge-kyō is just a name, but that is not so. … [I]t is neither the text nor the meaning but the heart of the entire sūtra.” Here Nichiren drew on the Chinese tradition of title exegesis, in which the entire meaning of a particular sūtra was held to be encompassed by its title. Chih-i, for example, had organized the major portion of the Fahua hsüan-i, his commentary on the Lotus Sūtra, as a discussion of the five characters that comprise the sūtra’s title. (Page 267)

Original Enlightenment and the Transformation of Medieval Japanese Buddhism


The Wholesome Sūtra

With regard to sūtra that can be translated as the Wholesome teaching (Fan Shan-Y’ü-chiao) in terms of teaching, practice and principle, Chih-i asserts that the teaching of the Worldly Siddhānta is the teaching of wholesome words (seeing that the Buddha, in order to suit the capabilities of beings, focuses on encouraging sentient beings to cultivate wholesomeness within them for obtaining good effect); the Siddhānta for Each Person, and the Siddhānta of Counteraction are the teaching of wholesome practice (as the Buddha teaches sentient beings the methods of cultivating wholesomeness and destroying evil within them); and the Siddhānta of the Supreme Truth is the teaching of wholesome principle (as the Buddha addresses beings truth of liberation). (Vol. 2, Page 394)

The Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sutra: Tien-tai Philosophy of Buddhism


Day 6

Day 6 continues Chapter 3, A Parable

Having last month considered why the rich man gave the largest carts to his children, we begin the Parable of the Burning House in gāthās with the condition of the house.

Thereupon the Buddha, wishing to repeat what he had said, sang in gāthās:

I will tell you a parable.
A rich man had a manor house.
It was old, rotten,
Broken and ruined.
The house was about to collapse.
The lower parts of the pillars were rotten;
The beams and ridge-poles, tilting and slanted;
The foundation and steps, broken;
The fences and walls, corrupt;
The plaster of the walls, peeling;
The rush thatched on the roof, falling;
The rafters and eaves, slipping out of each other;
The hedges around the house, bent;
And refuse and debris, scattered all over.

In this house lived
Five hundred people.
Kites, owls, crested eagles,
Eagles, crows,
Magpies, doves, pigeons,
Lizards, snakes, vipers, scorpions,
Millipedes, wall lizards, centipedes,
Weasels, badgers, mice, rats,
And poisonous vermin
Were moving about.

Maggots and other vermin
Assembled on the excretions
Scattered all over
In the house.

Foxes, wolves, and small foxes
Were crawling on corpses,
Biting them, chewing them,
And dismembering them.

Many dogs were scrambling for their prey.
Weak and nervous from hunger,
They were seeking food here and there.
They were fighting with each other,
Snapping at each other,
And barking at each other.
The house was
So dreadful, so extraordinary.

Mountain spirits, water spirits,
Yakṣas and other demons
Lived here and there.
They fed on people and poisonous vermin.

Wild birds and beasts
Hatched their eggs,
Suckled or bred.
They protected their offspring.
Yakṣas scrambled for their young,
Took them, and ate them.
Having eaten to their hearts’ content,
They became more violent.
They fought with each other.
Their shrieks were dreadful.

The demons called kumbhandas
Crouched on the ground
Or jumped a foot or two above the ground.
They walked to and fro
And played at their will.
They seized dogs by the legs,
Or hit them
Until they lost their voices,
And held their feet against their necks.
They enjoyed seeing them frightened.

Some demons,
Tall, large,
Naked, black, and thin,
Lived in the house.
They were crying for food
With loud and evil voices.

The necks of some demons
Were as slender as needles.
The heads of some demons
Were like that of a cow.
They ate people or dogs.
Their hair was disheveled
Like mugworts.
They were cruel and dangerous.
Always hungry and thirsty,
They were running about, shrieking.

Yakṣas, hungry spirits,
And wild birds and beasts
Were unbearably hungry.
They were looking out of the windows
In all directions for food.
The house was so dangerous, so dreadful.

The Introduction to the Lotus Sūtra offers this on the suffering world that is the burning house:

Another important point of the parable [of the Burning House] is that we humans are allegorically illustrated as living in a burning house. The burning, of course, symbolizes our suffering. From the Buddhist viewpoint, suffering is an inescapable fact of life, as illustrated in the dictum, “All existence is suffering.” Many people think this view is too pessimistic, but that is not the case. The dictum is presented as a bare fact, neither good or bad. Biological suffering is a part of life. The question is, What can we do about it?

Introduction to the Lotus Sutra