Of all the concepts found in the Lotus Sutra the most profound and difficult to understand is the concept raised in Chapter 16 that the Buddha is always present. He didn’t die and, since he has always been teaching here, he was never born.
“All that I say is true, not false, because I see the triple world as it is. I see that the triple world is the world in which the living beings have neither birth nor death, that is to say, do not appear or disappear, that it is the world in which I do not appear or from which l do not disappear, that it is not real or unreal, and that it is not as it seems or as it does not seem. I do not see the triple world in the same way as the living beings of the triple world do.”
In the Introduction to Buddhism for Today, Nikkyō Niwano offers a wonderful way to relate to the idea of an ever-present Original Buddha.
Buddhism for Today, pxxv“The human form in which the Original Buddha appeared in this world is the historical Sakyamuni as the appearing Buddha. We can easily understand the relationship between the two when we consider the relationship between electric waves and television. The electric waves emitted by television transmitters fill our surroundings. We cannot see, hear, or touch them, but it is a fact that such electric waves fill the space around us. When we switch on our television sets and tune them to a particular channel, the same image appears and the same voice is heard through every set tuned to that wavelength. The Original Buddha is equivalent to the person who speaks from the television studio. He is manifest not only in the studio but also permeates our surroundings like electric waves. The appearing Buddha corresponds to the image of this person that appears on the television set and to the voice emanating from it. The appearing Buddha could not appear if the Original Buddha did not exist, just as no television image could appear and no voice be heard if electric waves did not exist. Conversely, we cannot see the Original Buddha except through the appearing Buddha, just as we cannot receive electric waves as images and voices except through the medium of a television set.”
In his Introduction, Nikkyō Niwano accuses the schools of Nichiren Buddhism of slipping into merely formalism and disparages those who say beating a drum or chanting the Daimoku is all that’s needed. I would argue that formalism and the drum and the Daimoku are each a valid means with which “to tune the wavelength of our own lives to that of the truth of the universe.” Yes, it is a mistake to say one is more essential than the other, as exclusivists do. Yet these are all beneficial devises. We need to recognize that we each have different causes and conditions, and so one device may be more effective than another for each of us.
Table of Contents Next Essay