This is another in a series of weekly blog posts comparing and contrasting the Sanskrit and Chinese Lotus Sutra translations.
In comparing H. Kern’s English translation of the 11th century Nepalese Sanskrit Lotus Sutra with English translations of Kumārajīva’s fifth century Chinese Lotus Sutra, there are two major differences that stand out. First, is the lack of the 10 Suchnesses in Chapter 2 in Kern’s version. The other is the addition in Kern’s version of seven verses in the gāthās of Chapter 25, The Universal Gate of World-Voice-Perceiver Bodhisattva.
The opening prose section of the chapter is essentially the same.
Kern, for example, has:
Those who shall keep the name of this Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Avalokiteśvara, young man of good family, will, if they fall into a great mass of fire, be delivered therefrom by virtue of the luster of the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva.
While Murano has:
Those who keep the name of this World-Voice-Perceiver Bodhisattva will not be burned when they are put into a conflagration [because they are protected] by, the supernatural powers of this Bodhisattva.
But there are some minor differences. For example, in Kumārajīva’s Lotus Sutra, when Endless-Intent Bodhisattva offered World-Voice-Perceiver a necklace, World-Voice-Perceiver refused it and the Buddha had to intervene to convince World-Voice-Perceiver to accept the gift. Murano has:
The Endless-Intent Bodhisattva said to the Buddha, “World-Honored One! Now I will make an offering to World-Voice-Perceiver Bodhisattva.” From around his neck, he took a necklace of many gems worth hundreds of thousands of ryo of gold, and offered it [to the Bodhisattva], saying, “Man of Virtue! Receive this necklace of wonderful treasures! I offer this to you according to the Dharma!”
World-Voice-Perceiver Bodhisattva did not consent to receive it. Endless-Intent said to World-Voice-Perceiver Bodhisattva again, “Man of Virtue! Receive this necklace out of your compassion towards us!”
Thereupon the Buddha said to World-Voice-Perceiver Bodhisattva:
“Receive it out of your compassion towards this Endless-Intent Bodhisattva, towards the four kinds of devotees, and towards the other living beings including gods, dragons, yakṣas, gandharvas, asuras, garuḍas, kiṃnaras, mahoragas, men and nonhuman beings!”
Thereupon World-Voice-Perceiver Bodhisattva received the necklace out of his compassion towards the four kinds of devotees, and towards the other living beings including gods, dragons, men and nonhuman beings. He divided [the necklace] into two parts, and offered one part of it to Śākyamuni Buddha and the other to the stupa of Many-Treasures Buddha.
In Kern’s translation the Buddha does not intervene:
Further, the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Akshayamati said to the Lord: Shall we give a gift of piety, a decoration of piety, O Lord, to the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Avalokiteśvara? The Lord replied: Do so, if thou thinkest it opportune. Then the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Akshayamati took from his neck a pearl necklace, worth a hundred thousand (gold pieces), and presented it to the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Avalokiteśvara as a decoration of piety, with the words: Receive from me this decoration of piety, good man. But he would not accept it. Then the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Akshayamati said to the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Avalokiteśvara: Out of compassion to us, young man of good family, accept this pearl necklace. Then the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Avalokiteśvara accepted the pearl necklace from the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Akshayamati, out of compassion to the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Akshayamati and the four classes, and out of compassion to the gods, Nāgas, goblins, Gandharvas, demons, Garuḍas, Kinnaras, great serpents, men, and beings not human. Thereafter he divided (the necklace) into two parts, and offered one part to the Lord Śākyamuni, and the other to the jewel Stūpa of the Lord Prabhūtaratna, the Tathāgata, &c., who had become completely extinct.
Kern’s gāthās, however, are significantly different, beginning with the question of who is talking.
It should be noted here that Kumārajīva did not translate these gāthās. These were translated by Jñānagupta and inserted between 561 and 601 CE, according to Murano’s notes.
In Murano’s translation, Endless-lntent Bodhisattva repeats the question he made at the opening of the chapter and the Buddha responds.
Thereupon Endless-lntent Bodhisattva asked the Buddha in gāthās:
World-Honored One with the wonderful marks
I ask you about this again.
Why is the son of the Buddha
Called World-Voice-Perceiver?The Honorable One with the wonderful marks answered Endless-Intent in gāthās:
Kern’s chapter begins with the Bodhisattva Akshayamati asking the Buddha about Avalokiteśvara, but for the gāthās Kern has the Buddha recalling a conversation between Akshayamati and another bodhisattva:
And on that occasion the Lord uttered the following stanzas:
1. Kitradhvaga asked Akshayamati the following question: For what reason, son of Jina, is Avalokiteśvara (so) called?
2. And Akshayamati, that ocean of profound insight, after considering how the matter stood, spoke to Kitradhvaga: Listen to the conduct of Avalokiteśvara.
Leon Hurvitz, who consulted both Kumārajīva’s Chinese translation and a Sanskrit compilation of the Lotus Sutra, notes this difference and comments:
In the Skt. it is supposedly the Buddha speaking. On the face of it, this is very puzzling. It seems to me, however, that this must be a survival from the primitive Lotus, which was presumably a work entirely in verse. If so, then the first śloka was Akṣayamati’s question introduced by narrative, while the second śloka begins the Buddha’s answer, likewise introduced by narrative. Later editors of the text, however, who knew the Lotus only as a work of combined verse and prose, misunderstood the passage and garbled it. As we have it, then, “Akṣayamati of the particolored banner questioned this matter, namely, the reason (kāraṇāt): / ‘For what cause is the son of the Victorious One called Avalokiteśvara?’ // Then by the discerning Teacher was Akṣayamati, the sea of vows, / he of the particolored banner, addressed: ‘Hear of the conduct of Avalokiteśvara!”‘ // The only conundrum is then kāraṇāt, which one might emend to read kāraṇam.
The extra stanzas in Kern’s gāthās appear near the end. Here’s what Murano offers from Kumārajīva:
By all these merits, he sees
All living beings with his compassionate eyes.
The ocean of his accumulated merits is boundless.
Therefore, bow before him!Thereupon Earth-Holding Bodhisattva rose from his seat, proceeded to the Buddha, and said to him:
Kern has an equivalent verse at the start:
26. He who possesses the perfection of all virtues, and beholds all beings with compassion and benevolence, he, an ocean of virtues, Virtue itself, he, Avalokiteśvara, is worthy of adoration.
But before we get to the the Bodhisattva Mahāsattva Dhārāṇidhara, Kern’s translation includes these verses emphasizing Avalokiteśvara relationship with Amitābha Buddha and praising Amitābha:
27. He, so compassionate for the world, shall once become a Buddha, destroying all dangers and sorrows; I humbly bow to Avalokiteśvara.
28. This universal Lord, chief of kings, who is a (rich) mine of monastic virtues, he, universally worshipped, has reached pure, supreme enlightenment, after plying his course (of duty) during many hundreds of Æons.
29. At one time standing to the right, at another to the left of the Chief Amitābha, whom he is fanning, he, by dint of meditation, like a phantom, in all regions honors the Jina.
30. In the west, where the pure world Sukhākara is situated, there the Chief Amitābha, the tamer of men, has his fixed abode.
31. There no women are to be found; there sexual intercourse is absolutely unknown; there the sons of Jina, on springing into existence by apparitional birth, are sitting in the undefiled cups of lotuses.
32. And the Chief Amitābha himself is seated on a throne in the pure and nice cup of a lotus, and shines as the Sāla-king.
33. The Leader of the world, whose store of merit has been praised, has no equal in the triple world. O supreme of men, let us soon become like thee!
Kumārajīva’s Lotus Sutra contains several references to Amitābha, but this section of verse in Kern’s Lotus Sutra seems out of place as if appended onto the sutra at a later time.