Question: Various sūtras other than the Lotus Sūtra also state that an evil person can become a Buddha. It is preached in the Flower Garland Sūtra that five hundred evil people such as Devadatta will become Buddhas in the future. The Fuchō Zammai Sūtra states that an evil king, Ajātaśatru, will become a Buddha in the future and in the Sūtra of Mahayana Dhārani is the story of Vāsudeva, who had gone to hell because of his evil deeds but was guaranteed future Buddhahood. As for the enlightenment of women, the Bosatsu Shotai Sūtra says that any woman can become a Buddha. As for the enlightenment of beasts and birds, the Agama sūtras say that a pigeon will be a Buddha in the future. The enlightenment of the Two Vehicles is mentioned in the Sūtra of Mahayana Dhārani and the Heroic Valor Sūtra. The enlightenment of bodhisattvas is mentioned in such sutras as the Flower Garland Sūtra. As for rebirth in the Pure Land by ordinary people bound by evil passions, the Sūtra of Meditation on the Buddha of Infinite Life says that even “the lowest grade in the lowest class” will be reborn in the Pure Land of the Buddha of Infinite Life, no matter how serious one’s sin is. As for a woman turning into a man, the Sūtra of the Buddha of Infinite Life states in the thirty-fifth of its forty-eight vows that a woman can turn into a man by reciting the name of the Buddha of Infinite Life and be reborn in the Pure Land. How are these enlightenments thus revealed in these various provisional sutras different from the assurance of future Buddhahood of the Two Vehicles, a dragon girl, Devadatta, and bodhisattvas in the Lotus Sūtra? Also, there is no doubt that they all attain Buddhahood in these various sutras even though there are some differences between them and the Lotus Sūtra. What do you think of this?

Answer: It is easy to answer your question based on the teachings passed down to me which I hold dear. After hearing my answer, you will clearly see that the Lotus Sūtra is superior to the various other sutras and determine whether or not it is indeed possible to become Buddhas in those sutras. However, I cannot write this down on paper because it is the secretly treasured doctrine of the Buddha.

Ichidai Shōgyō Tai-i, Outline of All the Holy Teachings of the Buddha, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 88-89.

I’ve included this quote for my future reference more than the substance. It is important to acknowledge that other sūtras have elements similar to the teachings of the Lotus Sūtra, but when the Lotus Sūtra is viewed in its entirety no other sūtra is as uniquely wonderful as the Sūtra of the Lotus Flower of the Wonderful Dharma, the Dharma for Bodhisattvas, the Dharma Upheld by the Buddhas.

The Lotus Sūtra of the fifth period consists of one fascicle of the Sūtra of Infinite Meaning as an introduction, eight fascicles of the Lotus Sūtra, and one fascicle of the Sūtra of Meditation on the Universal Sage Bodhisattva as the conclusion, bringing the total number of fascicles to ten.

The reason for my commentaries on the Four Teachings (Tripitaka, Common, Distinct, and Perfect) and the Four Periods (Flower Garland, Agama, Expanded, and Wisdom) is to help others learn what the Lotus Sūtra is. For one cannot correctly understand the teaching of the Lotus Sūtra without learning the pre-Lotus Sūtras, although one may study the pre-Lotus Sūtras without learning about other Sūtras.

In support of this, Grand Master T’ien-t’ai stated in his Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sūtra, “When attempting to spread various sūtras other than the Lotus Sūtra, the essential part of the teaching will not be lost even if a doctrinal analysis of all the teachings of the Buddha is not rendered. When attempting to spread the Lotus Sūtra, however, the essence of the teaching may be lost if a doctrinal analysis is not made.” It is preached in the Lotus Sūtra (chapter 2, “Expedients”), “Although the Buddhas expound various teachings, it is for the purpose of leading the people into the world of the One Buddha Vehicle.” “Various teachings” here refer to all the pre-Lotus Sūtras. “For the purpose of leading the people into the world of the One Buddha Vehicle” means to expound all the scriptures of Buddhism to reveal the Lotus Sūtra.

Ichidai Shōgyō Tai-i, Outline of All the Holy Teachings of the Buddha, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 81.

Yesterday, on Day 17 of 100 I mentioned my joy at having this opportunity to learn more about Buddhism in general through the lens of the Lotus Sūtra. And then I got to the above quote in the same letter and immediately underscored one cannot correctly understand the teaching of the Lotus Sūtra without learning the pre-Lotus Sūtras.

Speaking only for myself – keeping in mind the Simile of the Herbs – my search for knowledge of Buddhism has led me to a greater appreciation of the Lotus Sūtra. And as I consider whether my experience applies to others, I wonder whether a lack of basic understanding of Buddhism inhibits the spread of the Lotus Sūtra. Americans or any other people from non-Buddhist lands are at a great disadvantage when compared with, say, Japanese. People immersed in the various flavors of the lesser vehicles have a vast head start on appreciating the majesty of the Lotus Sūtra promise.

The purpose of the Tripitaka teaching is to emancipate people from the Six Realms of the triple world. As a result, because the teaching reveals no place but the triple world to attain emancipation, śrāvaka and pratyekabuddha are unaware of the existence of the Pure Land where bodhisattvas are born. They also do not know that they still possess other evil passions and attachments besides the delusions in view and thought. Śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas believe they will eliminate the cause of being reborn in the triple world if they do away with the delusions in view and thought and that they will exist in a void where there is no body or mind, since they will have transformed the body to ashes and annihilated consciousness. Thus it is said that men of the two Vehicles cannot be saved by the Tripitaka teaching, and that they will never be able to become Buddhas without the teaching of the Lotus Sūtra.

Ichidai Shōgyō Tai-i, Outline of All the Holy Teachings of the Buddha, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 72.

This is an excellent example of what I was hoping to learn during this 100 days of studying Nichiren’s writings. This survey of the teachings of the Buddha helps in understanding how all of the rivers lead to the ocean of the Lotus Sūtra.

This daimoku chanting has not yet been spread in the world. For 2,225 years after the extinction of the Buddha no one has chanted this yet. I, Nichiren, alone have been chanting “Namu Myōhōrengekyō, “Namu Myōhōrengekyō without saving my voice.

As you know, the size of waves depends on the strength of the winds, the height of a fire depends on firewood, the size of lotus flowers depends on the size of the ponds, the quantity of rain depends upon dragons; the deeper the roots of a tree are, the wider its branches grow; and the farther away a river begins, the longer it flows. The Chou dynasty lasted seven hundred years because King Wen paid much attention to propriety and filial piety. Early destruction of the Ch’in dynasty was due to the tyranny of its First Emperor.

With Nichiren’s boundless compassion, “Namu Myōhōrengekyō” will be heard forever even beyond the ten thousand year-period. It has the merit of curing the “blindness” of all the people in Japan, blocking the way to hell. This merit is superior to those of Dengyō, T’ien-t’ai, Nāgārjuna, and Kāśyapa. Practice for a hundred years in the Pure Land is not worth the merit of chanting the daimoku for one day in this defiled world. Propagation of the daimoku in a two thousand year-period following the death of the Buddha is not worth as much as spreading the daimoku for even a short while in the Latter Age of Degeneration. This is not from my wisdom; it is solely due to the time in which I live. In spring, flowers bloom; in autumn, fruits ripen; in summer, it is warm; and in winter, it is cold; they all go along with the laws of nature.

Hōon-jō, Essay on Gratitude, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 58.

Having concluded the Essay on Gratitude, I’m adding some of the notes for future reference:

• Precept dais—The platform where those who believe in Buddhism receive Buddhist precepts. During the lifetime of the Buddha it was set up in the Jetavana-vihāra (Gion Shōja), and in China it was set up in the city of Loyang. In Japan several precept daises were set up. The Platform for the Perfect and Suddent Mahayana Precepts was established soon after Grand Master Dengyō’s death on Mt. Hiei. In Nichiren Buddhism, some insist that the precept platform of the hommon should be established somewhere in Japan, while others maintain that the place where one keeps the odaimoku even if only for an instant and puts it in practice is the Precept Platform of the hommon.
• Triple world—All living beings are floating in the stream of samsära and experiencing a variety of different lives. They are generally divided into three realms: 1) the realm of desire in which living beings are subjected to desire for sex and food, corresponding to the “six realms of illusion,” that is, realms of hell, hungry spirits, birds and beasts, asura, human beings, and part of heaven; 2) the realm of “form” in which living beings have no desire for sex and food; 3) the “formless” realm in which living beings live beyond material existence.
• Indra—Skt.: Śakro devānām indrah Jp.: Taishakuten. Originally a god of Hinduism, Indra is a god who protects Buddhas and their followers. Living in Trāyastriṃśa Heaven (Tōriten), he is served by the Four Heavenly Kings.
• Mt. Sumeru—Jp.: shumisen. According to the Buddhist cosmology, this mountain is located in the center of the world 84,000 yojana in height, and all the heavenly beings live on it. The sun and moon circle this mountain, on top of which Indra has his castle. The continent called Jambudvipa, where human beings live, exists to the south of it.
• Four Heavenly Kings—Also called Four Great Heavenly Kings (Shidaiten-nō). They are kings of the “four-king heavens (shiō-ten)” around Mt. Sumeru. While serving Indra, they control the eight kinds of gods and demi-gods to protect Buddhism and those who put faith in it. As they vowed to protect this world and Buddhism in it, they are also called the “Four Heavenly Kings Protect the World (Gose Shiten-nō). They consist of four guardian kings: Jikoku-ten (Dhrtarāṣṭra) in the east, Zōchō-ten (Virūḍhaka) in the south, Kōmoku-ten (Virūpākṣa) in the west, and Tamon-ten (Vaiśravaṇa) in the north. Nichiren Shōnin highly esteemed the Four Heavenly Kings as protectors of the Lotus Sutra, placing large signs for them at the four corners of the great mandala honzon.

This virtue of Nichiren, I am sure, is known to all from the venerable Three Treasures above down to such heavenly beings as the King of the Brahma Heaven, Indra, and the sun and moon. The souls of my parents and Master Dōzen will be given plenty of help by this virtue of mine.

However, I have one doubt here. Venerable Maudgalyāyana tried to save his mother, Moggaliyā, who had fallen to the realm of hungry spirits, but in vain for she was kept suffering there. Sunakṣatra, a son of the Buddha Śākyamuni when He was a bodhisattva in His previous life, was influenced by evil friends and fell into the Hell of Incessant Suffering. The Buddha must have wished to save His son with His might, but He could not help him because that was caused by his own karma.

I do not think that the late Master Dōzen hated me, for I am one of his beloved disciples. However, he was cowardly. Moreover, he had a strong attachment to Mt. Kiyosumi. He was fearful of Steward Tōjō Kagenobu. Besides, Priests Enchi and Jitsujō, as evil as Devadatta and Kokālika, were always by his side, intimidating him. He was so frightened that he abandoned his disciples who followed him for many years, even though he loved them. Therefore, I am not sure about his next life. It was lucky for him that Kagenobu, Enchi, and Jitsujō died before him. They died because of the condemnation of the ten female rākṣasa demons, guardian deities of the Lotus Sūtra. If they had lived longer, Master Dōzen would not have had time even to have a little faith in the Lotus Sūtra. Their deaths enabled him to have a little faith in the Lotus Sūtra, but it was as useless as fighting sticks after quarrels are over or a lantern in the daytime. Besides, it is quite natural that one feels compassion for his children and disciples under any circumstances. Master Dōzen probably took pity on me exiled on the island of Sado, but he never asked about me, though it seemed possible for him to do so. I do not think, therefore, that he truly believed in the Lotus Sūtra.

Hōon-jō, Essay on Gratitude, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 48-49.

I’m moved by the compassion of Nichiren for his former teacher and the use of Maudgalyāyana and his mother and the other examples to illustrate that, much as we might wish for an alternative, the reality is as it is.

The compassion behind this acknowledgement of Dōzen’s failings is underscored by the dedication of merit at the end of the letter:

Flowers will return to their roots. The true taste of fruits remains in the earth. To my late Master Dōzen I have now dedicated all the merits I have accumulated in spreading the True Dharma.

Namu Myōhōrengekyō, Namu Myōhōrengekyō.

There are two ways of meditating on the doctrine of “3,000 existences contained in one thought.” One is the “theoretical” way, and the other is the “actual” way. Grand Masters T’ien-t’ai and Dengyō practiced the former. I, Nichiren, now practice the latter. As my method of practicing meditation is superior, difficulties befalling me are harder to bear. What T’ien-t’ai and Dengyō propagated was based on the doctrine of “3,000 existences contained in one thought” expounded in the theoretical section [of the Lotus Sūtra], while what I, Nichiren, propagate is based on the doctrine of “3,000 existences contained in one thought” in the essential section. The difference between the two is as great as the difference between heaven and earth. Remember this especially at the time of the last moment of life. Have an unwavering faith in the Lotus Sūtra and continue chanting the daimoku, which is the right way of meditation based on the “actual” doctrine of “3,000 existences contained in one thought. “

Toki Nyūdō Go-henji: Chibyō-shō, A Response to Lay Priest Lord Toki: Treatise on Healing Sickness, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 257.

The importance of this letter is underscored in the Introduction:

According to Nichiren, the greater difficulties he and his followers encounter show the appearance of the “actual” doctrine of “3,000 existences contained in one thought” in contrast to the “theoretical” doctrine advocated by T’ien-t’ai and Dengyō, and it represents the true doctrine of the essential section.

Here lies the uniqueness of Nichiren Buddhism. Nichiren Shōnin termed his own interpretation of the doctrine of “3,000 existences contained in one thought actual” and called that of T’ien-t’ai and Dengyō “theoretical.” On the basis of this “actual” interpretation of the doctrine of “3,000 existences contained in one thought,” Nichiren Shōnin found the way of saving the populace by having them put their faith in and chant the daimoku.

This marks the completion of the second week of my 100-day goal. I’ve finished Doctrine 2 (the second volume), which puts me on a pace to cover all seven volumes in the 14.3 weeks that comprise 100 days.

Now, as far as my theology goes, I would like you to think that what I have expressed before being banished to Sado Island can be equated with the forty or so years in which Śākyamuni had taught before revealing the Lotus Sūtra (that is, the truth and true aims of the Buddha were not directly divulged in those years). If the ruler of this country desires to govern the people under a proper political principle, then there will always be an opportunity for me to debate with the priests of the Shingon Sect. I shall expound my precious teaching for the first time then. Even if I had discussed this only within the circle of my disciples, some of it would bound to have leaked out making it difficult to conduct a discussion (as a result of their scheming). Such is why I have kept quiet about this to all of you. However, ever since the night of the twelfth of the ninth month in the eighth year of the Bun’ei Period (1271), when I was about to be beheaded at Tatsunokuchi (on the outskirts of Kamakura), I have come to think that it was unwise of me to have kept the truth from some of you who have stuck with me. There is a teaching I have disseminated quietly from the island of Sado (where I had been banished) to my disciples.

This is a teaching which great commentators in India and great masters in China and Japan who have come after the Buddha, such as Kāśyapa, Ānanda, Nāgārjuna, Vasubandhu, T’ien-t’ai, Miao-lê, Dengyō and Gishin, knew to be true in their hearts but never imparted. This is because the Buddha had strictly warned that, “this important teaching should not be passed on in the thousand years of the Age of the True Dharma and thousand years of the Age of the Semblance Dharma before entering the Latter Age of Degeneration.” Nichiren is not a direct emissary of the Buddha; however, as long as I have come to be in this Latter Age of Degeneration and have, quite beyond expectations, attained this doctrine, I would like to transmit it in the capacity of a herald, until Bodhisattva Superior Practice, a messenger of the Buddha, appears. Once this teaching is exposed, the teachings spread by the elders during the Ages of the True Dharma and Semblance Dharma would pale in comparison, just as the stars are obscured by the rising sun, or as if we see a dull performance after a skillful one. It is written in the sūtras that when the Latter Age of Degeneration dawns, such things as the spiritual power of Buddhist sculptures and priests of the temples built in the Ages of the True and Semblance Dharmas would be effaced; and its only legacy would be the dissemination of this great teaching throughout the world (Jambudvipa). All of you should feel grateful that you are endowed with the opportunity to have come across such a wonderful teaching.

Misawa-shō, A Letter to Lord Misawa of Suruga, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 241-242.

The Introduction to this letter provided by the translators offers this:

This letter represents a vital piece of evidence provided by Nichiren himself upon which many scholars rely in supporting the fact that there exists a difference in Nichiren’s revelation of doctrines and intensity of teaching before and after his Sado exile.

Something to consider as I continue through the 100 days of study.

It is said in [Chapter 7, The Parable of the Magic City], “Those who heard the Dharma from those śramaṇera (teachers) are now living under those Buddhas.” T’ien-t’ai stated (in the Words and Phrases of the Lotus Sūtra), “The Buddha in the Western Pure Land is different from the Buddha in this Sahā World; therefore, no relationship between parents and children exists between the Buddha of Infinite Life and us, ordinary beings in the Sahā World.” Miao-lê explains this (in his Annotations on the Words and Phrases of the Lotus Sūtra) that the Buddha of Infinite Life and Śākyamuni are different Buddhas. (…) Their relationships to us from past lives are different, so are their ways of teaching. Sowing the seeds of Buddhahood in living beings by the Buddha is similar to giving birth to a child by parents, and guiding the people by the Buddha is similar to raising a child by parents. If the parents who give birth to a child and parents who raise him are different, the true relationship between parents and child does not exist.

In these days, people in Japan believe that the Buddha of Infinite Life will come to save them. This is as nonsensical as feeding a baby cow or horse milk or trying to have the moon reflected on a roof tile.

Hokke Shuyō Shō, Treatise on the Essence of the Lotus Sūtra, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 208.

In quoting from Nichiren’s writings I tend to eschew those quotes that challenge the beliefs of other Buddhist sects. Quotes detailing the merits of the Lotus Sūtra and the benefits of Na Mu Myo Ho Ren Ge Kyo are simply more valuable to me. But in this case, I want to underscore my faith in this idea that we who are born in this Sahā World are the children of Śākyamuni. To cast Śākyamuni aside and instead cling to a Buddha from some other land is just unthinkable.

All sūtras preached prior to the Lotus Sūtra state that bodhisattvas and ordinary people are able to attain Buddhahood, but never the people of the Two Vehicles. Thinking that they can become Buddhas while the people of the Two Vehicles cannot, wise bodhisattvas and ignorant people throughout the six realms felt happy. The people of the Two Vehicles plunged into grief and thought, “We should not have entered the Buddhist way.” Now in the Lotus Sūtra, they are guaranteed of attaining Buddhahood, so not only the people of the Two Vehicles, but also the people of the nine realms will all become Buddhas. Upon hearing this dharma, bodhisattvas realized their misunderstanding. As stated in the pre-Lotus sūtras, if the people of the Two Vehicles cannot attain Buddhahood, then the Four Great Vows cannot be accomplished. Consequently, bodhisattvas would also be unable to become Buddhas. When it was preached that people of the Two Vehicles were unable to attain Buddhahood, they should not have been left alone in sadness; bodhisattvas should have joined them in grief.

Shōjō Daijō Fumbetsu-shō, The Differences between Hinayana and Mahayana Teachings, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 194-195.

Having never studied other forms of Buddhism I’m always puzzled how followers of pre-Lotus sūtras even approach the Bodhisattva vows knowing that some sentient beings are excluded. What does “Sentient beings are innumerable; I vow to save them all” mean if Śrāvakas and Pratyekabuddhas are excluded?

Nevertheless, if there is a man after the death of the Buddha who breaks the attachment to the false doctrines of the “four tastes and three teachings” of the pre-Lotus sūtras and puts faith in the True Dharma of the Lotus Sūtra, all the virtuous gods and numerous bodhisattvas who sprang up from underground will protect such a practicer of the Lotus Sūtra. Under such protection, this practicer would be able to spread over the world the honzon revealed in the essential section and the five-word daimoku of “myō, hō, ren, ge, and kyō,” the essence of the Lotus Sūtra.

He is just like Never-Despising Bodhisattva, who in the Age of the Semblance Dharma after the death of Powerful Voice King Buddha spread in the land of this Buddha the twenty-four character passage in the Lotus Sūtra (chapter twenty) saying: “I respect you deeply. I do not despise you. Why is it? It is because you all will practice the way of bodhisattvas and will be able to attain Buddhahood.” With such propagation, the Bodhisattva was severely persecuted by all the people in the land, who beat him with sticks and threw stones at him.

Kembustsu Mirai-ki, Testimony to the Prediction of the Buddha, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 174.

Considering this quote approximately 745 years later, one must affirm the accuracy of the prediction: This practicer would be able to [has] spread over the world the honzon revealed in the essential section and the five-word daimoku of “myō, hō, ren, ge, and kyō,” the essence of the Lotus Sūtra.

I imagine Nichiren smiling at finding a man in Sacramento, California, writing about this in 2018.