Someone may wonder: “Among the sūtras transmitted to China and Japan, not one may be superior to the Lotus Sūtra. But there are numerous sūtras in India, in the Dragon Palace, in the heavens of the Four Heavenly Kings, in the sun and moon and in Trāyastriṃsá Heaven (abode of Indra at the top of Mt. Sumeru) and Tuṣita Heaven (abode of Bodhisattva Maitreya). It may be possible to find a sūtra among them which is superior to the Lotus Sūtra.”

In response, I would say that we can judge in general by observing one instance. We can see what is going on in the world without going out of the door. Ignorant people who look at the sky only in the south without looking at the sky in other directions may think that there is a sun in each direction. Seeing smoke hanging over a mountain, they may say that it is not a fire, because they do not see any flames. Those who think in such a way, you should know, are icchantika. They are nothing but blind fools!

Hōon-jō, Essay on Gratitude, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Pages 5.

The concepts of attaining enlightenment by the Two Vehicles and the Eternal Buddha are vital to the Lotus Sūtra. Although these concepts can scarcely be found in other sūtras, it is not at all uncommon in the Lotus Sūtra. The doctrine of Ichinen Sanzen, or the “Three Thousand Existences in One Thought,” is the rarest and the most miraculous. This theory is revealed neither in the Flower Garland nor Great Sun Buddha Sūtras. Moreover, the founders of the eight Buddhist sects, except for Grand Master T’ien-t’ai, did not know even its name. The great philosophers Nāgārjuna and Vasubandhu of India knew it, but locked this important dharma jewel of Ichinen Sanzen deep within their hearts instead of writing it down for others to see.

Shōjō Daijō Fumbetsu-shō, The Differences between Hinayāna and Mahāyāna Teachings, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 193

Of the six realms, only in heaven are babies born clothed. In this world, people such as Śānavāsa and Nun Senbyaku emerged from their mothers’ womb fully clothed. This is not only because they had given clothing to revered people, but also because they had the karma of offering pure, thick clothing to their parents, masters and the Three Treasures.

Śānavāsa was born fully clothed because he had once given clothing to a naked Pratyekabuddha. Also Gautami had the virtue of giving gold-embroidered clothing to the Buddha, and according to the Lotus Sūtra she became Issai Shujō Kiken Buddha.

Since you have given clothing to the venerated Lotus Sutra, you will not only avoid the eight hells of ice in the next life, but also avoid hardship in this life. Your overflowing virtue will be given to your sons and daughters, and you will experience joy upon joy, and happiness upon happiness.

Otā-dono Nyōbō Go-henji, A Response to the Wife of Lord, Nyonin Gosho, Letters Addressed to Female Followers, Page 144-146

Śākyamuni Buddha is equipped with the three virtues of a lord, master and parent. As a lord, He protects the people; as a master He guides the people; and as a parent, He loves the people. It is only He who is perfectly equipped with these three virtues.

Ichidai Goji Keizu, Genealogical Chart of the Buddha’s Lifetime Teachings in Five Periods, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Page 244

In the fourth fascicle of the Lotus Sūtra, in the 10th chapter of the “Teacher of the Dharma,” it is preached, “Many people hate it (the Lotus Sūtra) with jealousy even in My lifetime. Needless to say, more people will do so after My extinction.” In the fifth fascicle of the same sūtra, the 14th chapter titled “Peaceful Practices” it is preached, “I did not expound the Lotus Sūtra before because, if I had done so, many people in the world would have hated it and few would have believed it.” It is also stated in the 13th chapter, “Encouragement for Upholding This Sūtra,” “We will not spare even our lives. We treasure only unsurpassed enlightenment.” The 16th chapter, “The Life Span of the Buddha,” preaches, “They wish to see Me (the Buddha) with all their hearts at the cost of their lives.”

In ninth fascicle of the Nirvana Sūtra, in “The Character of the Buddha” chapter, it is said, “For example, it is like a man, skillful in debate and eloquent in speaking, who is dispatched by the king to a foreign country and accomplishes his mission to convey the King’s message at the risk of his own life. Wise men in Buddhism are the same. Even if one is ordinary, one should not spare one’s own life but expound the Mahāyāna, great teachings of equality.” Grand Master Chang-an interpreted this passage, ” ‘Do not conceal the Buddha’s teachings even if you lose your life’ means that our life is inconsequential when compared to the profundity of the Dharma, hence we spread the Dharma at the risk of our life.”

Seeing these scriptural statements, we cannot say one is the true practicer of the Lotus Sūtra unless one is confronted by the three kinds of enemies while spreading the Dharma. He who spreads the Dharma in such a way as to cause the three kinds of enemies to appear is the true practicer of the Lotus Sūtra. If he does, however, he is bound to lose his life. He will be like Aryasimha, for example, who was beheaded by King Dammira, and Äryadeva, who was killed by a non-Buddhist.

Kyō Ki Ji Koku Shō, Treatise on the Teaching, Capacity, Time and Country, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 3, Page 104

As you married a man such as this, there is no doubt of attainment of Buddhahood by a woman. If this were a lie, Śākyamuni Buddha, the Buddha of Many Treasures, Buddhas in manifestation in all the worlds throughout the universe would be liars, and wicked. They would be people who would deceive all the people leading them into hell. Devadatta then would be the Lord of the Pure Land of Tranquil Light, and Śākyamuni Buddha would be choked by the flame in Avīci Hell. The sun and moon would fall to the ground, the great earth would be overturned, rivers would flow upside down, and Mt. Sumeru would be smashed into pieces.

If these actually happen, it is not due to my telling a lie; it is due to the lie of all the Buddhas throughout the universe in the past, present, and future existences. How can there be such a foolish thing?

Myōhō-ama Gozen Gohenji, A Reply to My Lady, the Nun Myōhō, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Faith and Practice, Volume 4, Page 143

When the Lotus Sūtra was preached on Mt. Sacred Eagle, King Ajātaśatru, the most unfilial man in the world, attended the meeting; even Devadatta, who had abused the True Dharma throughout his life, was guaranteed to be Tennō (Heavenly King) Buddha in the future. Furthermore, a dragon girl, though females were considered incapable of becoming a King of the Brahma Heaven, an Indra, a King of Devils, a Wheel-turning Noble King, or a Buddha, became a Buddha without changing her dragon-body. Attainment of Buddhahood by men of the Two Vehicles, and those with fixed natures who had been considered definitely incapable of becoming Buddhas, was as wondrous as a toasted seed germinating, flowering and bearing fruit. When Śākyamuni Buddha’s “attaining Enlightenment in the eternal past” was revealed, the audience was so astonished as to wonder how a hundred-year old man could be the son of a twenty-five year old man. The “3,000 existences contained in one thought” doctrine explained that unenlightened beings in the Nine Realms and enlightened ones in the Realm of the Buddha are one and inseparable, opening the way for the unenlightened to attain Buddhahood. Therefore, each letter of this sūtra represents a wish-fulfilling gem that pours out 10,000 treasures; each phrase of it is the seed of Buddhahood. The preaching of these most profound teachings was not done because of the capacity of the audience, their intelligence to understand or faith to uphold them. It was because the time was ripe. The Lotus Sūtra, chapter 2 on “Expedients,” therefore says: “Now is the time to expound the Mahāyāna teaching definitely.”

Senji-shō, Selecting the Right time: A Tract by Nichiren, the Buddha’s Disciple, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 1, Page 189

Contemplating on these, I am convinced that ordinary people in the Latter Age of Degeneration commit sins more or less. Whether or not such a man can reach Buddhahood depends on not how serious his sin is but whether or not he believes in the Lotus Sūtra. As a member of a warrior family you are always faced with killing people, which is firmly prohibited in Buddhism. It makes you an evil man. If you cannot leave your family and escape from society, how can you avoid falling into the three evil realms such as hell? You had better think about it carefully.

The Lotus Sūtra preaches that ordinary people with sins and illusions can attain Buddhahood. Therefore, you too, can attain Buddhahood without changing yourself as an ordinary and evil person. T’ien-t’ai says in his Words and Phrases of the Lotus Sūtra, “Sūtras preached before the Lotus Sūtra guarantee virtuous persons to obtain Buddhahood but not evil persons; however, both virtuous and evil persons are guaranteed to attain Buddhahood in the Lotus Sūtra.” Miao lê states in his Annotations on the Words and Phrases of the Lotus Sūtra, “The perfect teaching of the Lotus Sūtra explains that the reverse can be the order as it is, but the other three teachings (piṭaka, common and distinct teachings) maintain that the reverse is the reverse, and the order is the order, clearly separating the virtuous from the evil.” You should think hard of their meaning.

Hakii Saburō-dono Go-henji, A Response to Lord Hakii Saburō, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Doctrine 2, Page 188-189

[A letter of explanation written by Nichiren Shōnin on behalf of Shijō Yorimoto on the 25th of the sixth month in the third year of the Kenji Period (1277) and submitted to the lord of the Ema Family.]

In your same letter to me, Your Lordship wrote also that to accept wholeheartedly the idea of one’s master or parents regardless of whether or not they are morally right would please the gods and Buddhas, and it would be exemplary of world propriety. Yet as this is a matter of prime importance, I hesitate to express my own opinions directly. Instead, I would like to explain by quoting some passages from the works of ancient sages.

The Classic of Filial Piety states: “A child should remonstrate with his father if the father is wrong, and retainers should remonstrate with their lords if their lords are immoral.” Cheng-hsüan, a scholar in Latter Han in China, said: “If retainers and children do not remonstrate with their lords and parents when their actions are not righteous, their countries and homes will be destroyed without fail.” In the Hsin-hsii it is asserted: “Those who do not remonstrate with their tyrannical lord are not loyal retainers. Those who do not speak up due to fear of death are not brave men.” Grand Master Dengyō also stated: “If injustice has been done by their fathers and lords, children will have to fight against their fathers and retainers against their lords. Those who do not remonstrate are neither loyal retainers nor filial sons. In the same way, a disciple must remonstrate with his teacher in cases when his master is wrong.”

In the Lotus Sūtra it is further stated: “I have no concern for my life and body; I have only concern for the unsurpassed way.” The Nirvana Sūtra states: “When a man, who excels in debate and discussion, is sent to a foreign country by the emperor on a diplomatic mission, he should never have the imperial order insulted even at the cost of his life. Sages should act likewise!” Grand Master Chang-an interprets this passage of the Nirvana Sūtra to mean that as the dharma is greater than life itself, we should not hesitate to spread the dharma even at the cost of our lives. He further states that what undermines Buddhism is antagonism within Buddhism, and that seeing someone acting immorally, if you have no compassion to remonstrate with him, you will in the end become his antagonist. “Sternly reprimanding him and helping him overcome his misconduct is an act of parents,” said Chang-an.

Perhaps my fellow workers consider me, Yorimoto, brazen and disrespectful. We should obey our parents and lord on anything of worldly matters, but seeing my lord to whom I owe much, being deceived by practicers of evil teachings and about to fall into hell, how can I not lament? In ancient India, ever since King Ajātaśatru upheld Devadatta and the Six Brahman Masters as his teachers and stood against Śākyamuni Buddha, all the people of the Magadha Kingdom as well as his 580,000 relatives all became enemies of Buddhism. Among them, Minister Jivaka alone remained a disciple of Śākyamuni Buddha. King Ajātaśatru, just as Your Lordship is to me, Yorimoto, was displeased that Minister Jivaka continued to be a disciple of the Buddha. In the end, however, the king abandoned the evil teachings of his six ministers and became a devotee of the true teaching of the Buddha in which Jivaka believed. Likewise, I, Yorimoto, hope to save Your Lordship in the end.

Yorimoto Chinjō, Yorimoto’s Letter of Explanation, Writings of Nichiren Shōnin, Volume 5, Page 107-108